A whole lot of open windows, not much energy to make a coherent post.
Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis, by James Simpson. Thanks to blake for this one. It describes the Cloward-Piven strategy and its relationship to ACORN, Obama, and various foundations, and of course George Soros. Also at Simpson's blog. I mentioned this strategy, though not by that name, a year and a half ago: Got to break it before you can fix it.
Inside Obama's Acorn, by Stanley Kurtz. From last spring.
Why the press hides Obama’s lies, by Roger L. Simon at PJ Media. Lots of comments.
AT HOME WITH: Bernadine Dohrn; Same Passion, New Tactics, by Susan Chira, NY Times from 1993. At home with Mrs. William Ayers.
They named their children after some of their heroes. Their older son, Zayd Osceola Ayers Dohrn, was named in honor of Zayd Shakur, the Black Panther killed in New Jersey during a shootout with police in 1973, and Osceola, the Seminole chief who sheltered runaway slaves. Their 13-year-old, Malik Cochise, takes his names from Malcolm X (El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz) and the 19th-century Apache chief who fought settlers encroaching on his land.Not Quite Ready to Join the Crusade, by Victor Davis Hanson at PJ Media.
Hot Air has some videos: The Ayers connection. The third video includes a brief interview with John Murtagh, who wrote this, in City Journal last April: Fire in the Night: The Weathermen tried to kill my family. Inline update: at 7:34 in this last video, after the Murtagh interview, is a clip from a 1998 interview in which Connie Chung begs Ayers and Dohrn to repent of their violent actions. Their response is to fall all over each other with interruptions in their eagerness to say that they did not do enough. "I wish we'd done more." "We'd do it again." No ambiguity here.
The WSJ has Bill v. Barack on Banks: Clinton instructs Obama on finance and Phil Gramm.
A running cliché of the political left and the press corps these days is that our current financial problems all flow from Congress's 1999 decision to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 that separated commercial and investment banking. Barack Obama has been selling this line every day. Bill Clinton signed that "deregulation" bill into law, and he knows better.How allies of George Soros helped bring down Wachovia Bank, by Ed Lasky. If you didn't quite understand what was going on in that Saturday Night Live video that is so hard to find (try here!), the one with Herbert and Marion Sandler, this will lay it out for you.
Stanley Kurtz asks, "What exactly does a "community organizer" do?" in O's Dangerous Pals: Barack's 'organizer' buds pushed for bad mortgages, in the NY Post.
And here's one from last February on the Global Poverty Act, Obama's Global Tax, by Lee Cary in the American Thinker.
Just a couple more here. Powerline is keeping up with ACORN: "Is ACORN stealing the election?"
It is reasonable to ask whether ACORN is in fact a criminal conspiracy to subvert the voting rights of Americans. Which makes it all the more remarkable that Barack Obama paid ACORN $800,000 to register new voters, and then lied about it, falsely telling the Federal Elections Commission that the $800,000 went to a group called Citizen Services Inc. for "advance work."ACORN's Criminal Enterprise, Continued. "At least nine states have now launched criminal investigations of ACORN…." Oh, look, they also have this video of Louis Farrakhan, last Feb 24, calling Obama the messiah.
5 comments:
I've never been a fan of the RICO Act, but I wouldn't mind seeing it used here.
I don't think I understand the relevance of RICO enough to know why it would be applicable to, what, ACORN, or Dodd, Frank & Co., or ??
But—considering the way that state attorneys general have been able to collaborate on lawsuits against, tobacco companies come to mind, but there been a number of these things, would the Feds even need to get involved? Would it be advisable to try to involve the Feds? With a Federal case, one word from on high stops it. But I'm still not sure who you would want to prosecute.
Who would I want to prosecute? The guys at the top. Who is that? I don't really know.
These guys are good at pretending they're independent.
Here you go: The Buckeye Institute has filed a RICO suit against ACORN in Ohio. I hope it comes to trial soon, before the election. But I doubt that it will.
Yeah, I saw that.
Thing is, so many people feel he's entitled to win, they'd never accept that: a) he's not entitled to run (say if the birth certificate thing had legal validity); b) he's not entitled to all the votes he can cheat.
Who has the courage to face these people down? And of those, who is in a position to do so?
Post a Comment